Conveyor Alternative: Why EU Companies Are Evaluating Options

TL;DR

Conveyor offers a solid standalone trust center with strong AI questionnaire automation, transparent pricing, and a generous free tier. It's the most comparable US competitor to Orbiq in terms of product scope. But Conveyor's positioning is SOC 2-first with no visible NIS2 or DORA support, no EU hosting option, and the same CLOUD Act exposure as any US vendor. Orbiq is built for the European market — with EU hosting by default, NIS2/DORA-native structure, and similar standalone architecture.

What Conveyor Does Well

Conveyor is a focused product, and that focus shows.

Founded in 2021 in San Francisco, the company has raised $13M in funding and built a customer base that includes notable names like Atlassian, PagerDuty, Carta, and Freshworks. Unlike the GRC platforms that bolt on a trust center, Conveyor was designed from the start as a customer trust automation platform.

Specific things worth acknowledging:

Standalone trust center — no GRC platform required. You can use Conveyor purely as a trust center and document-sharing portal.
AI questionnaire automation — this is Conveyor's standout feature. Their AI claims 95%+ accuracy in generating questionnaire responses and 90% reduction in manual time. It supports Excel files, PDFs, and even fills out third-party portals (like OneTrust) via a browser extension.
Published pricing — Conveyor is one of the few competitors that actually publishes pricing. Free tier at $0/year, Professional at $9,600/year.
Generous free tier — includes a trust center with up to 15 documents, 15 Q&As, clickwrap NDA, auto-watermarking, and 120 gated access grants per year. No questionnaire automation on the free tier.
Professional tier is clear — $9,600/year gets you the full platform: unlimited documents, 100 trust center credits, 20 questionnaire credits (1 credit = 100 questions), 10 RFP projects, custom domain, Salesforce integration, SCIM/SSO, and analytics.
Browser extension — Conveyor can auto-fill security questionnaires directly within third-party vendor assessment portals. This is a genuinely useful feature that most competitors lack.
RFP automation — beyond security questionnaires, Conveyor handles broader RFP response workflows.

If you're a US SaaS company that needs a trust center, AI questionnaire automation, and transparent pricing — Conveyor is a compelling choice.

Where European Buyers Hit Friction

Conveyor's product quality isn't the issue. The friction is structural: the platform was built for US SaaS companies selling to US buyers, and certain EU-specific requirements aren't addressed.

1. No Visible EU Hosting Option

Conveyor's pricing page lists hosting as "Hosted by Conveyor" on the free tier and "Custom domain" on Professional. There's no mention of EU hosting, EMEA data centres, or data residency options anywhere in their public documentation.

For European companies whose customers and procurement teams expect data to stay in the EU, this is a fundamental gap — not a feature limitation but a missing infrastructure option.

2. No NIS2 or DORA Support

Conveyor's positioning centres on SOC 2, security questionnaires, and trust center document sharing. Their website, blog, and product pages contain no references to NIS2, DORA, or EU-specific regulatory frameworks.

This doesn't mean Conveyor can't be used by companies subject to NIS2 or DORA — you can upload any documents to a trust center. But there's no framework-specific structuring, no NIS2/DORA-aware templates, and no content architecture designed to present EU compliance evidence in the way these regulations require.

For European companies whose buyers increasingly ask "how does your trust center address NIS2 supply chain requirements?" — Conveyor doesn't provide a structured answer.

3. SOC 2-First Positioning

Conveyor's customer examples (Atlassian, PagerDuty, Carta, Freshworks) are US SaaS companies. The platform's messaging, templates, and questionnaire knowledge base are built around SOC 2 and general security review workflows.

ISO 27001 is implicitly supported (you can upload any certification), but the platform doesn't structure content around it as the primary framework. GDPR, NIS2, and DORA aren't mentioned in the product positioning.

4. CLOUD Act Exposure

Conveyor is headquartered in San Francisco. Like any US company, it's subject to the CLOUD Act. Without an EU hosting option, this is compounded — your trust center data is likely hosted in the US, governed by US law, and accessible to US authorities.

For European companies handling sensitive security documentation, this may create friction in procurement conversations with EU buyers and DPOs.

5. Small Team, Early Stage

Conveyor has approximately 48 employees and has raised $13M in total funding. This is a small company compared to Vanta (15,000+ customers) or Drata (8,000+ customers).

This isn't inherently negative — focused products from smaller teams can be excellent. But for European enterprise buyers who evaluate vendor stability as part of procurement, it's a factor worth noting. Conveyor's long-term roadmap, EU investment plans, and support capacity are harder to evaluate than those of larger vendors.

What European Companies Should Look For

If you're a European company evaluating Conveyor, here's what matters:

EU Hosting

Your trust center stores security documentation, compliance evidence, and potentially sensitive infrastructure details. For EU buyers, EU hosting should be the baseline, not a missing feature.

NIS2/DORA-Aware Structure

A trust center for European companies should structure content around NIS2 supply chain security requirements, DORA ICT third-party risk management, and ISO 27001 certification — not just SOC 2 and general security documents.

Data Sovereignty

Ask where the vendor is incorporated and where data is hosted. If the answer is "US" to both questions, your trust center data is governed by US law — which matters for regulated industries.

Published Pricing (Credit to Conveyor)

Conveyor gets this right. Published pricing with a free tier is how it should work. Look for the same from any vendor you evaluate.

Conveyor vs Orbiq: Side-by-Side

Factor	Conveyor	Orbiq
Product type	Standalone trust center + AI questionnaire/RFP automation	Standalone trust center + vendor assurance
Headquarters	San Francisco, US	Hamburg, Germany
EU hosting	Not available (no EU hosting option listed)	EU by default
Data sovereignty	US-hosted, US corporate structure, CLOUD Act applies	EU corporate structure, EU jurisdiction
Pricing	Published: Free ($0) and Professional ($9,600/year)	Published: Free tier available
Free tier	15 documents, 15 Q&As, 120 gated access grants/year, no questionnaire automation	Core trust center features
AI questionnaire automation	Strong — 95%+ accuracy claimed, browser extension for portal auto-fill	Emerging — AI-supported questionnaires
RFP automation	Yes — dedicated AI agent for RFP responses	No
NIS2/DORA support	Not mentioned in product or documentation	Yes — trust center structures content around NIS2/DORA requirements
Primary frameworks	SOC 2 positioning; framework-agnostic document hosting	ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2, DORA as primary
CRM integrations	Salesforce, Slack, DocuSign (Professional tier)	API/webhook-driven; native integrations emerging
Subprocessor display	Not a highlighted feature	Public by default
Vendor assurance	Not offered	Available — continuous monitoring of third-party security posture
Browser extension	Yes — auto-fill questionnaires in third-party portals	No
Target market	US SaaS companies	EU companies and companies selling to EU buyers
Company size	~48 employees, $13M raised	Early-stage

When Conveyor Is Still the Right Choice

Conveyor makes sense if:

AI questionnaire automation is your primary pain point — Conveyor's questionnaire AI is its standout feature, including the browser extension for third-party portal auto-fill. If you spend significant time answering security questionnaires, Conveyor is currently ahead of most competitors here.
You're a US SaaS company — or your primary buyers are US-based and expect SOC 2-first documentation
You want transparent pricing — Conveyor's published pricing ($9,600/year for Professional) is competitive and clear
The free tier meets your needs — 15 documents and 120 gated access grants per year may be sufficient for smaller companies
You need RFP automation — Conveyor's AI handles broader RFP responses, not just security questionnaires
EU hosting and NIS2/DORA don't matter — if your buyers don't require EU data residency or NIS2-structured evidence

If those describe your situation, Conveyor offers good value. It's a focused, well-built product at a reasonable price.

How Orbiq Approaches This Differently

Orbiq and Conveyor share the most important architectural decision: both are standalone trust centers, not GRC platforms with a trust center bolted on. The difference is market orientation.

Built for EU buyers. Orbiq's trust center structures content around ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA — the frameworks European procurement teams and regulators actually ask about.

EU hosting is default. EU-headquartered, EU-hosted. No CLOUD Act exposure. This isn't an add-on or enterprise tier — it's the starting point.

NIS2/DORA-aware structure. The trust center presents supply chain security evidence, incident communication infrastructure, and vendor assurance in the way NIS2 Article 21 and DORA Articles 28–30 require.

Vendor assurance included. Orbiq includes continuous monitoring of your third-party vendors' security posture — something Conveyor doesn't offer. Under NIS2, supply chain security is a core obligation.

Published pricing. Like Conveyor, Orbiq publishes pricing. Free tier to start. No hidden enterprise minimums.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Conveyor offer EU hosting?

Based on publicly available information, Conveyor does not offer an EU hosting option. Their pricing page describes hosting as "Hosted by Conveyor" without specifying data centre location or regional options. European companies requiring EU data residency should confirm this directly with Conveyor.

Does Conveyor support NIS2 or DORA?

Conveyor's website, product pages, and documentation do not reference NIS2 or DORA. The platform supports general security document hosting (you can upload any compliance documentation), but there's no framework-specific structuring or NIS2/DORA-aware templates.

How does Conveyor's pricing compare to Orbiq?

Conveyor's Professional plan is $9,600/year. Orbiq publishes pricing with a free tier. Both offer transparent pricing — a strength both platforms share and an advantage over competitors like Vanta, Drata, and SafeBase.

Is Conveyor's AI better than Orbiq's?

For questionnaire automation specifically, yes. Conveyor's AI questionnaire feature is more mature, claims 95%+ accuracy, and includes a browser extension that auto-fills questionnaires directly in third-party portals like OneTrust. This is a genuinely differentiated capability. Orbiq's AI features are emerging.

Can I use Conveyor if I'm a European company?

Yes. Nothing prevents a European company from using Conveyor. The question is whether the platform's US-only hosting, SOC 2-first positioning, and lack of NIS2/DORA support create friction with your EU buyers, regulators, or procurement teams.

Key Takeaways

Conveyor is a focused, well-built standalone trust center — the closest US competitor to Orbiq in product architecture
AI questionnaire automation is Conveyor's strength — including a unique browser extension for portal auto-fill
Published pricing is a shared advantage — both Conveyor and Orbiq publish pricing, unlike Vanta/Drata/SafeBase
No EU hosting option — a fundamental gap for European companies with data residency requirements
No NIS2/DORA support — EU regulatory frameworks aren't addressed in the product
CLOUD Act applies — US-headquartered, likely US-hosted
For EU companies: the product is strong, but the market orientation doesn't match

See How Orbiq Works

If you like Conveyor's standalone approach but need EU hosting, NIS2/DORA structure, and no CLOUD Act exposure — Orbiq was built for exactly that.

→ View our Trust Center (yes, we use our own product)

→ See Pricing

→ Start Free