
Vanta Trust Center Alternative: Why EU Companies Are Evaluating Options
Vanta is the most widely adopted trust management platform in the world. But for European companies that already have an ISMS and just need the external proof layer, that architecture creates friction.
TL;DR
Vanta serves 15,000+ companies across 58 countries and offers genuine NIS2, DORA, and GDPR framework support — more than most competitors. But for European companies that don't need a full GRC platform, the trust center comes bundled with compliance automation you may already have, pricing requires a sales conversation, and the platform's US corporate structure means CLOUD Act exposure persists even with EU hosting. Orbiq is a standalone trust center built for EU companies — with EU hosting by default, published pricing, and no GRC bundle required.
What Vanta Does Well
Vanta deserves its market position. It's the largest player in the compliance automation space and has invested meaningfully in Europe.
The platform supports over 35 compliance frameworks, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2, DORA, and the EU AI Act. It integrates with 375+ tools to automate evidence collection and continuous control monitoring. For companies that need a full compliance automation platform and a trust center, Vanta offers genuine depth.
Specific things worth acknowledging:
- EU data centre in Frankfurt (AWS), announced in 2024. EU customers can choose EMEA hosting and access the platform via a dedicated EU instance.
- NIS2 and DORA framework support — with pre-mapped controls, policy templates, and cross-framework mapping. Vanta claims to automate up to 65% of NIS2 compliance tasks.
- AI capabilities — the Vanta AI Agent handles policy generation, questionnaire responses, and in-portal search. The trust center includes an AI chatbot that visitors can query directly.
- Policy templates in French, Spanish, and German — a rare acknowledgment that Europe doesn't operate in English only.
- Deep CRM integrations — native Salesforce and HubSpot workflows that tie trust center activity to pipeline and ARR.
- Offices in Dublin and London — with a European Customer Success team.
If you're a growth-stage company that needs compliance automation, vendor risk management, questionnaire handling, and a trust center in one platform — and you have the budget for it — Vanta is a serious option.
Where European Buyers Hit Friction
The friction isn't that Vanta is bad. It's that Vanta is a GRC platform that includes a trust center, and European companies often encounter specific structural issues.
1. The Trust Center Lives Inside a GRC Platform
Vanta's trust center is described on their product page as "available as a standalone product or as an add-on to your existing Vanta plan." In practice, the trust center is most powerful when paired with Vanta's compliance engine — it pulls live control status directly from Vanta's monitoring agents.
For European companies that already run an ISMS (ISO 27001 via DataGuard, Secureframe, or an internal programme), this creates a question: do you adopt Vanta's full GRC platform to get the trust center features, or use it standalone and lose the live-data advantage?
The standalone trust center without the compliance platform means manually uploading evidence — which is what any trust center does, but you're paying Vanta pricing for what becomes a document-sharing portal.
2. Pricing Requires a Sales Conversation
Vanta's pricing page lists four tiers — Essentials, Core, Growth, and Enterprise — all with "custom pricing" requiring a demo request.
Based on publicly reported data (via AWS Marketplace listings and procurement platforms like Vendr):
- Core package: approximately €7,500–€11,500/year for one framework
- Trust Center add-on: approximately €6,000/year
- Growth tier: €15,000–€25,000/year with multiple frameworks
- Enterprise: €30,000–€80,000+/year
These are reported ranges, not published prices. Your actual quote will depend on company size, frameworks, and negotiation. Vanta is known to offer significant first-year discounts (reports of 50–70% off list price) with renewal uplifts of 10–30%.
For a European startup or mid-market company that just needs a trust center, paying €10,000+ for a compliance platform to access the trust center component may not match the budget.
3. EU Hosting Exists — But CLOUD Act Exposure Persists
Vanta offers EU hosting in Frankfurt. This is a real investment and addresses data residency requirements. Credit where it's due.
However, Vanta is a US-headquartered company (San Francisco). Under the US CLOUD Act, US authorities can compel US companies to produce data regardless of where it's physically stored. Vanta's DPA uses EU Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) as the transfer mechanism, with the Irish Data Protection Commission as lead supervisory authority.
For many companies, this is fine. For regulated industries under NIS2 and DORA — particularly financial services, healthcare, and critical infrastructure — the distinction between data residency and data sovereignty increasingly matters in procurement decisions.
4. SOC 2 Is the Primary Framework
Vanta was built for SOC 2 compliance automation. That's where the platform is deepest, where the most integrations exist, and where the user experience is most polished.
ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA are supported — and supported well compared to most competitors. But the product's information architecture, default templates, and onboarding flow still lead with SOC 2. If your buyers expect to see ISO 27001 certification status and NIS2-relevant controls front and centre in your trust center, you may find yourself working against the platform's defaults rather than with them.
5. Annual Contracts and Lock-In
Multiple user reports on review platforms (Capterra, G2, Vendr) describe rigid annual contracts with limited flexibility. One Capterra reviewer noted: a startup with fewer than 10 employees was unable to cancel when financial circumstances changed and was held to the contract term.
This is standard for enterprise SaaS but worth noting for European startups and SMEs evaluating options.
What European Companies Should Look For
If you're a European company evaluating Vanta's trust center specifically (not the full GRC platform), here's what matters:
Standalone Trust Center
If you already have an ISMS or GRC tool, you shouldn't need to buy another one just to get an external proof layer. Look for trust centers that work independently — pulling from your existing compliance infrastructure rather than requiring you to adopt a new one.
Published Pricing
You should be able to evaluate whether a tool fits your budget before entering a sales process. Published pricing with a free tier for evaluation respects your time and your procurement process.
EU Hosting by Default
Not as an option you select during onboarding. Not as a feature available on certain tiers. Default.
True Data Sovereignty
For regulated industries: ask where the vendor is incorporated. If it's the US, your data may be subject to US legal access regardless of hosting location. This matters when your trust center contains penetration test results, security architecture details, and compliance evidence.
EU Frameworks as Primary
Your trust center should present ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA as primary frameworks — not as additions to a SOC 2-first structure.
Vanta Trust Center vs Orbiq: Side-by-Side
| Factor | Vanta Trust Center | Orbiq |
|---|---|---|
| Company type | US GRC platform (trust center is one product) | EU trust center platform (standalone) |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, US (offices in Dublin, London) | Hamburg, Germany |
| EU hosting | Available (Frankfurt, AWS) — customer selects during setup | EU by default |
| Data sovereignty | US corporate structure; subject to CLOUD Act | EU corporate structure; EU jurisdiction |
| Pricing | Not published; requires sales conversation. Reported: €10K+/year for platform + trust center | Published pricing; free tier available |
| Trust center deployment | Strongest when bundled with Vanta GRC; standalone available but reduced functionality | Standalone by design |
| Primary frameworks | SOC 2 primary; ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2, DORA supported | ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2, DORA as equals |
| AI features | Mature — AI Agent, AI chatbot for visitors, questionnaire automation | Emerging — AI search and AI-supported questionnaires |
| CRM integrations | Deep Salesforce, HubSpot integration with ARR attribution | API/webhook-driven; native integrations emerging |
| Subprocessor display | Available within trust center | Public by default |
| Contract terms | Annual contracts; renewal uplifts reported | Flexible; no long-term lock-in required |
| NIS2/DORA support | Yes — framework-level with pre-mapped controls (GRC platform) | Yes — trust center structures content around NIS2/DORA requirements |
| Target market | Global; US-primary, expanding in Europe | EU companies and companies selling to EU buyers |
When Vanta Is Still the Right Choice
We're not going to pretend Orbiq is right for everyone. Vanta makes sense if:
- You need a full GRC platform — compliance automation, vendor risk management, questionnaire automation, and a trust center in one suite
- SOC 2 is your primary framework — Vanta's SOC 2 automation is the deepest on the market
- You want mature AI features — Vanta's AI Agent and visitor-facing AI chatbot are ahead of most competitors, including us
- You need deep CRM integration — native Salesforce workflows with ARR attribution and deal velocity tracking
- You have enterprise budget — and prefer a sales-led procurement process with negotiable pricing
- You're building a compliance programme from scratch — Vanta's onboarding guides you through framework selection, policy generation, and evidence collection
If those describe your situation, Vanta is a defensible choice. The friction points we've outlined matter less when you need the full platform.
How Orbiq Approaches This Differently
Orbiq was built as a standalone trust center for European companies. Not a GRC platform with a trust center feature.
Standalone by design. Use Orbiq alongside your existing ISMS, DataGuard, Secureframe, or internal compliance programme. You don't need to adopt a new GRC platform.
EU hosting is default, not an option. Your trust center data is hosted in the EU by an EU-headquartered company. No CLOUD Act exposure.
Pricing is published. Free tier to start, paid tiers with clear boundaries. No sales conversation required to see if it fits your budget.
EU frameworks are first-class. ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA structure the trust center from the start — not retrofitted onto a SOC 2-first architecture.
Subprocessors are visible. Your visitors see where data goes without requesting access or signing NDAs for basic information.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Vanta offer a standalone trust center?
Yes. Vanta's product page states the trust center is "available as a standalone product or as an add-on." However, key features like live control monitoring and real-time compliance status require the broader Vanta platform. As a standalone product, the trust center functions primarily as a document-sharing and access-management portal.
Does Vanta support NIS2 and DORA?
Yes. Vanta announced NIS2, DORA, and EU AI Act framework support in October 2024. This includes pre-mapped controls, policy templates, and cross-framework mapping. This is genuine framework-level support within Vanta's GRC platform — more comprehensive than most competitors offer.
Does Vanta offer EU hosting?
Yes. Vanta operates an EU data centre in Frankfurt (AWS), announced in April 2024. EU customers access the platform via a dedicated EU instance. However, as a US-headquartered company, Vanta remains subject to the CLOUD Act regardless of where data is stored.
How does Vanta's pricing compare to Orbiq?
Vanta's pricing is not published and requires a sales conversation. Based on publicly reported data, the platform typically starts at €7,500–€11,500/year for one framework, with the trust center as an add-on at approximately €6,000/year. Orbiq publishes its pricing with a free tier available for immediate evaluation.
Is Vanta's AI better than Orbiq's?
Yes, currently. Vanta's AI Agent is more mature — it handles policy generation, questionnaire automation, and powers a visitor-facing AI chatbot within the trust center. Orbiq's AI capabilities are emerging, focused on AI-powered search and AI-supported questionnaire responses. If high-volume AI questionnaire automation is your primary need, Vanta is currently stronger.
Key Takeaways
- Vanta is a strong full-stack GRC platform — the trust center is one component of a larger suite
- EU investment is real — Frankfurt hosting, NIS2/DORA support, European offices and team
- Standalone trust center loses key features — the value proposition depends on using Vanta's compliance engine
- Pricing opacity favours enterprise buyers — SMEs and startups often discover misalignment after entering the sales process
- CLOUD Act exposure persists — EU hosting doesn't change US corporate jurisdiction
- If you already have an ISMS, you may not need Vanta's GRC — a standalone trust center might be the better fit
See How Orbiq Works
If you need a standalone trust center with EU hosting, published pricing, and NIS2/DORA-native structure — without adopting a full GRC platform — Orbiq might be what you're looking for.
→ View our Trust Center (yes, we use our own product)