What Is DevSecOps?
DevSecOps is the practice of integrating security into every phase of the software development lifecycle rather than treating it as a final checkpoint. It embeds automated security testing into CI/CD pipelines, makes security a shared responsibility across development, security, and operations teams, and ensures that applications are built securely from the first line of code.
The shift from traditional security reviews to DevSecOps reflects the reality of modern software delivery: when teams deploy multiple times per day, security cannot wait for quarterly penetration tests. Instead, security must be continuous, automated, and developer-friendly.
DevSecOps Pipeline Stages
| Stage | Security Activities | Tools |
|---|
| Plan | Threat modelling, security requirements, secure design patterns | STRIDE, OWASP threat models |
| Code | Secure coding standards, pre-commit hooks, IDE security plugins | Semgrep, SonarLint, ESLint security rules |
| Build | SAST, SCA, dependency scanning, secrets detection | Semgrep, Snyk, GitLeaks, Trivy |
| Test | DAST, API security testing, container scanning | OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, Trivy |
| Deploy | IaC scanning, admission controllers, image signing | Checkov, OPA/Gatekeeper, Cosign |
| Operate | Runtime protection, WAF, RASP | Falco, ModSecurity, cloud WAF |
| Monitor | Vulnerability monitoring, SBOM tracking, CVE alerting | Dependabot, Snyk Monitor, Grype |
Security Testing Types
| Testing Type | What It Analyses | When It Runs | Detection Strength |
|---|
| SAST | Source code, bytecode | Build time | Code-level vulnerabilities (SQLi, XSS, injection) |
| DAST | Running application | Post-deployment | Runtime vulnerabilities, misconfigurations |
| SCA | Third-party dependencies | Build time | Known CVEs in open-source libraries |
| IAST | Application during testing | Integration testing | Runtime code paths with context |
| Secrets detection | Code, configs, commits | Pre-commit, build | Hardcoded credentials, API keys, tokens |
| IaC scanning | Terraform, CloudFormation, K8s manifests | Pre-deploy | Infrastructure misconfigurations |
| Container scanning | Docker images, registries | Build, deploy, runtime | Image vulnerabilities, misconfigurations |
Vulnerability Management in DevSecOps
| Severity | SLA (MTTR) | Pipeline Action | Example |
|---|
| Critical | 24 hours | Block deployment | Remote code execution, SQL injection |
| High | 7 days | Block deployment | Authentication bypass, SSRF |
| Medium | 30 days | Warn, allow deployment | XSS (stored), insecure deserialization |
| Low | 90 days | Inform only | Information disclosure, verbose errors |
Software Supply Chain Security
| Control | What It Does | Tools |
|---|
| SBOM generation | Create inventory of all software components | Syft, CycloneDX, SPDX |
| Dependency scanning | Identify known vulnerabilities in dependencies | Snyk, Dependabot, Renovate |
| License compliance | Detect restrictive or incompatible licenses | FOSSA, Snyk, WhiteSource |
| Artifact signing | Cryptographically sign build artifacts | Cosign, Sigstore, Notary |
| Provenance attestation | Prove where and how artifacts were built | SLSA framework, in-toto |
| Registry security | Control what images can be deployed | Harbor, admission controllers |
Secrets Management
| Approach | Security Level | Use Case |
|---|
| Environment variables | Low | Local development only |
| Encrypted config files | Medium | Simple deployments |
| Secrets manager | High | Production systems (AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Azure Key Vault) |
| Short-lived tokens | Very high | Service-to-service authentication |
| Workload identity | Very high | Cloud-native applications (no secrets at all) |
Compliance Requirements
Framework Mapping
| Requirement | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 | NIS2 | DORA |
|---|
| Secure development policy | A.8.25 | CC8.1 | Art. 21(2)(e) | Art. 8(1) |
| Security testing | A.8.29 | CC8.1 | Art. 21(2)(e) | Art. 8(3) |
| Secure coding practices | A.8.28 | CC8.1 | Art. 21(2)(e) | Art. 8(1) |
| Change management | A.8.32 | CC8.1 | Art. 21(2)(e) | Art. 8(2) |
| Environment separation | A.8.31 | CC6.7 | Art. 21(2)(e) | Art. 8(4) |
| Vulnerability management | A.8.8 | CC7.1 | Art. 21(2)(e) | Art. 8(3) |
| Third-party component security | A.8.30 | CC9.2 | Art. 21(2)(d) | Art. 8(5) |
Audit Evidence
| Evidence Type | Description | Framework |
|---|
| Secure development policy | Documented SDLC with security integration points | All frameworks |
| Pipeline security configuration | CI/CD pipeline showing security gates and scans | ISO 27001, SOC 2 |
| SAST/DAST scan reports | Regular scan results with remediation evidence | All frameworks |
| Dependency vulnerability reports | SCA reports showing known vulnerabilities and patches | All frameworks |
| Code review records | Pull request reviews with security considerations | ISO 27001, SOC 2 |
| Vulnerability remediation records | Tickets showing discovery-to-fix timeline | All frameworks |
| Environment separation evidence | Configuration proving dev/staging/production isolation | ISO 27001, DORA |
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Risk | Fix |
|---|
| Security scans but no enforcement | Vulnerabilities deployed despite detection | Implement blocking gates for critical/high findings |
| Only scanning on main branch | Vulnerabilities found too late in development | Scan on every pull request and feature branch |
| Ignoring dependency vulnerabilities | Known CVEs in production applications | Automate dependency updates with Dependabot/Renovate |
| Hardcoded secrets in code | Credential exposure via source control | Pre-commit hooks with secrets detection, use secrets managers |
| No container image scanning | Vulnerable base images in production | Scan images at build, in registries, and at admission |
| Security team as bottleneck | Developers bypass security to meet deadlines | Self-service security tools, automated pipelines, developer training |
How Orbiq Supports DevSecOps Compliance
Orbiq helps you demonstrate secure development practices:
- Evidence collection — Centralise pipeline configurations, scan reports, and remediation records
- Continuous monitoring — Track DevSecOps maturity and vulnerability trends
- Trust Center — Share your secure development posture via your Trust Center
- Compliance mapping — Map DevSecOps controls to ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIS2, and DORA
- Audit readiness — Pre-built evidence packages for auditor review
Further Reading